AS 4024 – Safety of Machinery: What It Really Requires

If you work around machinery in Australia, whether in mining, manufacturing, agriculture, or processing, you’ve almost certainly heard of AS 4024 – Safety of Machinery.

What’s less clear is what compliance actually looks like in practice, especially when machinery is:

  • Custom-built or modified

  • Older plant still in service

  • Imported equipment designed to overseas standards

  • Operating in harsh, real-world environments rather than a textbook example

AS 4024 is a suite of Australian Standards that sets out requirements for the design, construction, guarding, and operation of machinery to reduce risk to operators and maintainers.

It covers areas including:

  • Hazard identification and risk assessment

  • Guarding and protective devices

  • Emergency stops and control systems

  • Safe access, maintenance, and isolation

  • Functional safety concepts

AS 4024 is closely aligned with ISO machinery safety standards, but it also reflects Australian regulatory expectations which is critical when dealing with inspectors, regulators, and auditors.

Common issues we see include:

  • Guards that meet dimensional rules but fail real access risk scenarios

  • Emergency stops added late, without considering system architecture

  • Machinery modified over time, with no single point of design responsibility

  • Confusion between designer, manufacturer, installer, and PCBU obligations

  • Assumptions that “OEM compliant” equals “site compliant”

In many cases, machinery is partially compliant — which is often more dangerous than being clearly non-compliant.

Compliance Is About Engineering Judgement, Not Just Checklists

AS 4024 is not a box-ticking exercise, as Inspectors and regulators expect:

  • Clear identification of hazards

  • Demonstrated risk reduction using engineering controls

  • Evidence that safety measures are fit for purpose, not just nominally compliant

  • Decisions that can be justified technically and defensibly

How Trang Helps with AS 4024 Compliance

Trang works with clients across mining, industrial, and agricultural sectors to interpret and apply AS 4024 in practical, defensible ways.

Our involvement typically includes:

Machinery Safety Assessments

  • Identification of hazards in existing or proposed machinery

  • Review of guarding, access, and control systems

  • Alignment with AS 4024 requirements and intent

Guarding & Safety System Design

  • Design or review of physical guarding solutions

  • Integration of emergency stops and interlocks

  • Consideration of maintenance, access, and operability

Independent Engineering Review & Sign-Off

  • Third-party review of machinery safety compliance

  • Support for regulator or inspector queries

  • Engineering documentation that stands up to scrutiny

Support for Modified or Legacy Plant

  • Assessment of older machinery still in service

  • Practical upgrade pathways where full redesign isn’t realistic

  • Risk-based prioritisation rather than blanket replacement

Why Independent Engineering Input Matters

Many AS 4024 issues arise when:

  • Safety has been retrofitted late in the project

  • Responsibility is split across multiple parties

  • Documentation doesn’t match the machine as installed

Trang’s role is often to act as the independent engineer — bridging the gap between design intent, operational reality, and regulatory expectation.

That independence is especially valuable when:

  • Resolving disagreements between OEMs, fabricators, and site teams

  • Responding to regulator findings or improvement notices

  • Demonstrating that risks have been reduced so far as is reasonably practicable

AS 4024 Is About More Than Compliance

Done properly, machinery safety engineering:

  • Reduces downtime from incidents and rework

  • Improves maintainability and operability

  • Protects operators and the business

AS 4024 provides the framework — but it still requires sound engineering judgement to apply it correctly.

Trang supports clients from early design through to in-service plant assessments.

If you’re dealing with:

  • Machinery guarding concerns

  • Safety upgrades or modifications

  • Regulator or inspector scrutiny

Contact us for an initial conversation and help clarify the path forward.

Previous
Previous

AS 3990 and Highly Stressed Structural Steel

Next
Next

Engineering Safer Workplaces: How Trang Imagineering Delivers High-Value Safety Audits Across Mining, Industrial Sites and Agricultural Operations